Got your attention? Good.
A while back, I blogged about my
dissatisfaction with the Supernatural finale. I fucking love this show, man. I watch it faithfully, week after week. I love Sam and Dean. I love the whole dynamic. I loved where I thought the story was going. I haven't been this enamored with a TV show since the early days of
X-Files. Yeah, no joke.
Tonight,
Dee dropped a huge bomb on me. She's far more in touch with shit than I am, so she knows these things. She peruses the message boards where the crazy bitchfaces live. Ladies and gents, I just found out that fangirls are ruining my favorite fucking show!!
If you're not familiar with the show, you'll probably be lost at this point, so go get coffee and a doughnut or something. Go on, scram.
Everyone else with me? See, there was a storyarc that hinted a relationship might be forming between Dean and Jo, the daughter of a hunter Dean's dad worked with back in the day. I loved their chemistry, sort of shy and uncertain, which isn't like Dean at all. I couldn't wait to see the development.
Guess what? Jo isn't coming back. Why? Because crazy bitchface fangirls booed her at the various cons. They didn't want to see Dean hook up with her; obviously they think they stand some chance of boning a fictitious character. You will find them in the dictionary under D for Deluded. The actor himself, Jensen Ackles, is at this point scared shitless of his own fans. That means you're nutty as the daft old bitch in
Christmas Vacation who wrapped up her own fucking cat and a Jell-o mold, ladies! WTF were you thinking, booing the actress who played Jo? She was
good, unlike the Buffy knockoffs we're likely to see in season three.
From eonline:
Clo in Atlanta: Is Alona Tal, who plays Jo on
Supernatural, returning next season? I hope so, because I love her chemistry with Jensen Ackles.
The Magic 8 Ball says...very doubtful. According to Alona's reps, anything is possible, but since the show hasn't done anything with her character for a long time, they're not expecting a call any time soon. Alona -- best known to many of you as Veronica Mars' Meg Manning -- does, however, appear in the Cane pilot for CBS, and she should be recurring on that show as the girlfriend of Jamie Vega, one of the sons of Jimmy Smits' character.
Which brings me to my next point. You crazybitchfaces got a great female character axed and in return they're adding two girlie hunters to fuck up the show's dynamic! I can't believe they're screwing with this; the whole "brothers alone against the world" thing MAKES IT WORK. Morons.

Dee and I would like to cordially offer you crazy bitchface fangirls our dainty middle fingers, turned up. And to Kripke, we offer a friendly kick in the nuts.
Buffy wannabes on
Supernatural? HOW COULD YOU? I will close with this, since a picture is worth a 1000 words.

Sincerely,
Agitated
Supernatural Fan
(which is entirely different than a crazy bitchface fan, who goes around calling herself Mrs. Ackles on the Internet)
so beautiful. so succint.
GODDAMN YOU, KRIPKE!
(and crazy fangirls)
for the record, I only call myself Mrs. Ackles (actually, Mrs Ackles-Padalecki) in my head.
unlike this deluded whore.
I am riled, I tell you! This is so wrong. Someone call Selah. Does she know about this?!
I guess it's the opposite of Buffy, wherein Spike was supposed to be a one-time walk on character and all the fan girls in the world united to see his yummy self plastered all over the screen for seasons to come.
And I dread the demise of the show if they're going to add crazy-ass Buffy wannabes.
Stoopid CW. First Veronica Mars, now this...
The information we're getting about season three, though, doesn't make me hopeful. Fucking fangirls.
I know, Grammar Geek!! Alona Tal was good, and her character had wonderful chemistry with Dean. WTF is up with that? Do these crazy bitches think they have a real shot at these dudes? It's nuts.
Huh? Wha..? Was that the Bat-signal?
Yeah, I knew about it. I was trying to stay within my little bubble of denial.
And in point of fact, I don't think Kripke or the rabid fangirls are as much to blame as Dawn Ostroff, head of CW programming ( I think that's her title) who has NEVER "gotten" SPN -- Jensen said those words publicly at one point in an interview -- and is notorious for pushing her "teen drama" agenda on everything in her purview. The chick who plays Ellen has been quote on her own blog as saying she hasn't been asked back because the show has been pushed to cater to a younger demographic in terms of casting women.
It sucks. There's just no other way to look at it. Dean and Sam are going to share screentime with these Buffy-wannabes, and get THIS -- they're being cast as REGULARS. NOT "recurring" -- REGULARS. Which means we'll see a whole helluva lot of 'em before the season is through.
I fear it's the death knell for SPN.
God, I know WAY TOO FUCKING MUCH about this shit. It's not right.
Holy crap on a cracker, Ellen has been axed too?! I LOVE ELLEN. OMG. How they can do a show with their heads so far up their butts?
"they're being cast as REGULARS. NOT "recurring" -- REGULARS. Which means we'll see a whole helluva lot of 'em before the season is through."
Say it's not so! Dammit! What brand of crack were they smoking when they came up with this? This is bad, and the news just keeps getting worse. *headdesk*
But, it wasn't a total waste of time for me to read all that (;p), I now know that Jimmy Smits will be in a new show (I'd so do him) and I scooped up a couple of "fuck you" pics for future use. :D
It's going to be like Smallville where it will cease being about the mythology and become some hackneyed derivative Dawson's Creek crap.
God, it really gets on my TITS.
FUCKING CW. FUCK OSTRANOFF TOO FOR NOT PICKING UP THE AQUAMAN SHOW.
grr.
Now I'm sort of cringing to see what's coming in season three.
On the plus side, I just got my second box of books from Amazon, so I now have so many books to read that I don't know where to start. Expect to see some fangirl squeeing in the next week or two. I'm taking some time to read.
I'm cringing... and I'm excited. I'd watch the Winchester Bros in anything. I don't care.
but I wish the show didn't have to add stupid girls to the mix.
Well. No.
I can say for a fact that the network execs did for a time want things geared toward the younger market (including things for CW). Or at least that's what the Fox people told me.
I had been led to believe that they'd backed off on that a bit, but, p'raps not.
That demographic is great for some shows. Really not so much for Supernatural.
and
"This is gayer than one of Bryan Singer's twink parties."
and
"Wow, I can't decide who's better looking. On one hand, the blond one has eyelashes like tiny little fans and the other... has a jaw that can chop down trees."
Sometimes I worry about him.